The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has raised concerns over what it describes as attempts by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to prevent it from fielding candidates in the 2027 general elections.
In a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party alleged that recent administrative actions by INEC could hinder its ability to meet key legal requirements under the Electoral Act.
Dispute Over Correspondence Suspension
At the centre of the dispute is INEC’s decision to suspend acceptance of official communications from the ADC pending the outcome of a case before the Federal High Court. The electoral body maintains that the move is procedural, aimed at avoiding interference with ongoing judicial proceedings.
However, the ADC argues that the decision has far-reaching implications, particularly as it coincides with critical electoral timelines.
Concerns Over Statutory Deadlines
According to the party, the Electoral Act 2026 stipulates clear deadlines for political parties, including a mandatory 21-day notice period for key activities and submission of relevant documents. INEC has reportedly fixed May 10 as the deadline for such submissions.
The ADC contends that by refusing to receive its correspondence within this timeframe, INEC is effectively placing the party in a position where compliance becomes impossible.
The statement described the situation as a form of “artificial non-compliance,” warning that it could later be used as grounds to exclude the party from participating in the elections.
Leadership Recognition Controversy
The party further argued that INEC’s current stance contradicts its earlier recognition of the ADC leadership structure. It cited instances where the commission reportedly acknowledged its internal processes, including the July 29, 2025 National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting.
According to the ADC, INEC monitored the meeting and updated its records to reflect the emergence of David Mark as National Chairman and Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary.
The party also referenced a sworn affidavit allegedly filed by INEC before the Federal High Court in September 2025, which it claims affirmed recognition of its leadership and classified the matter as an internal party affair.
Call for Reversal and Transparency
While INEC has defended its decision as necessary to preserve judicial integrity, the ADC insists that the move creates legal and operational challenges that undermine due process.
The party has called on the commission to immediately resume acceptance of its correspondence, emphasizing the need for fairness and equal treatment of all political parties.
It also urged Nigerians to remain attentive to developments, warning that actions perceived as restrictive could have broader implications for democratic participation.
Broader Implications
The unfolding dispute highlights ongoing tensions between political parties and electoral authorities as preparations for the 2027 elections intensify. Analysts note that adherence to legal timelines and transparent engagement between stakeholders will be critical in maintaining confidence in the electoral process.
As the matter remains before the courts, both sides are expected to clarify their positions, with potential implications for party participation and the overall credibility of the electoral framework.